Pre-Order Borealis Estoril 300m Automatic

Pakz

Patriarch WIS
Still very unbalanced and full of "bad empty".

If you really don't want to underlying pips for accurate timing, at least have the numbers align with the minute indicators so that it doesn't look too clumsy.

The original was much more balanced (not perfect from a usability perspective as around the multiples of 10 minutes there are 3 missing minute markers almost everywhere. Can be circumvented by reading the bezel using other points of reference, that's sure, but awkward nonetheless).

 
Can we make the bezel like Pakz's latest Photo. This is what I've been recommending all along. A picture IS still worth a thousand words, apparently!
Still very unbalanced and full of "bad empty".

If you really don't want to underlying pips for accurate timing, at least have the numbers align with the minute indicators so that it doesn't look too clumsy.

The original was much more balanced (not perfect from a usability perspective as around the multiples of 10 minutes there are 3 missing minute markers almost everywhere. Can be circumvented by reading the bezel using other points of reference, that's sure, but awkward nonetheless).

still worth a thousand words, apparently!
 

Mrdolip

Master Apprentice WIS
Maybe change it to "B" to stand for BWG9 lume or Borealis. Good idea?
Indeed, I think it's a good idea to have a circled "B" as the BWG9 will be used; The "T" was for tritium, if I am not mistaken. But I would only use this "B" on the big triangle dial, as it only appeared on the Royal Navy model.
 

SimpleWatchMan

Master WIS
All 4 dial variant is going to be available according to Maria. Unless I misunderstood.
To keep cost down to minimum, one dial type variant would be the best for both supplier and consumers. But judging by this thread, this would not be possible.

Imo, big triangle with no date model and no triangle with 3 o'clock date model will be the more popular of the four dial. By offering just 2 models, it will be a better balance of keeping the cost down while satisfying the majority of the market.
 

SDGenius

Perfect Apprentice WIS
Indeed, I think it's a good idea to have a circled "B" as the BWG9 will be used; The "T" was for tritium, if I am not mistaken. But I would only use this "B" on the big triangle dial, as it only appeared on the Royal Navy model.
Well technically an "L" would be more appropriate because BGW9 is Luminova, Super Luminova at that
 
I think we don't need any letter on the dial designating the type of lume used. Back in the day, Tritium was probably a new and unique lume material. Today, there are numerous lume materials, so IMO it's not necessary to put the type of lume on the dial.
 

Pakz

Patriarch WIS
Totally agree. No need for a B or a T or whatever. Saying it's got Tritium was sort of important at the time because that meant the luminous material was not a radioactive compound like radium or promethium 147. It's the Royal Navy and Omega's equivalent of the famous "no rad" logo on the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms of 1965.
Nowadays, nobody uses radioactive compounds for lume, so it'd be a bit over the top to have something like that on the watch. Plus, well, simpler's better...
 
Top